UNDUE INFLUENCE

Greenpeace
includes Greenpeace, Inc. [501(c)(4)]
Greenpeace Fund, Inc. [501(c)(3)]
Greenpeace Foundation [501(c)(3)]
Greenpeace International, Inc. (dormant)


Undue Influence by Ron Arnold

Greenpeace Fund, Inc.
702 H St NW
Ste 300
Washington, DC 20001
http://www.greenpeaceusa.org

Phone: (202) 462-1177
Email contact:
jennifer.jones@wdc.greenpeace.org

Description: Anti-corporate activist organization hijacked from its original mission by extremists who have turned it into a shakedown group, according to Patrick Moore, Greenpeace co-founder. The rift in Greenpeace may be seen in the 1985 split between the original Greenpeace, now called Greenpeace Foundation, and the entities it created and were hijacked, consisting of Greenpeace, Inc., and Greenpeace Fund, Inc., comprising Greenpeace USA and profiled here.

A lead attack group in the anti-Exxon Mobil campaign: Chris Doran, creator of PressurePoint, arrested in the 1999 Seattle WTO riots, heads up the Greenpeace 2002 Campaign Exxon Mobil initiative.

Anatomy of Greenpeace shakedowns:

  • Greenpeace activists unlawfully occupy buildings, ships in harbor, and other private facilities to prevent others from going where they have a right to go.
  • Greenpeace activists use their media and internet capabilities to denounce their targets and bring pressure using opinionated claims.
  • Greenpeace activists negotiate with the target, usually a large corporation, either directly or through a public relations agency that employs or contracts with Greenpeace activists.
  • Greenpeace gains a position of influence within the target.

Greenpeace tactics are covered in depth in Nick Nichols' book, Rules for Corporate Warriors: How to Fight and Survive Attack Group Shakedowns.

Greenpeace is profiled in Ron Arnold and Alan Gottlieb's book, Trashing the Economy: How Runaway Environmentalism is Wrecking America.

GREENPEACE INC.
1436 U ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009-3997
Income: $21,425,231
Assets: $2,524,559
As of Feb 1996, subsequent filings to come
Exempt since: Jan 1988
Employer ID: 52-1541501

And GREENPEACE FUND INC.

Financial condition, 2000, Greenpeace Fund, Inc.
  Revenue     Expenses
Contributions $7,490,882
Government Grants $0
Program Services $0
Investments $426,534
Special Events $0
Sales $0
Other $0
 
Program Services $8,984,276
Administration $347,832
Other $1,277,995
Total Expenditures $10,610,103
Total Revenue $7,917,416   NET GAIN/LOSS $(2,692,687)

 
Board of Directors, Greenpeace Fund, Inc.
David Chatfield, Chairman Karen Topakian, Member
Sebia Hawkins, Member  

Greenpeace is very open about destroying free enterprise. "I don’t believe in the market approach.... It results in treating toxics or pollution as a commodity...When companies have a bottom line of profit you won’t have them thinking about the environment." So said former Greenpeace USA Executive Director Peter Bahouth in the left-wing newspaper In These Times in April 1990.

Anti-capitalist rhetoric shouldn’t come as much of a surprise from a group reconstituted from the 1969 Don’t Make a Wave Committee, a bunch of American Vietnam War draft dodgers who fled to Vancouver, British Columbia, and, with some Canadian supporters backed by American Quaker money, tried to stop U. S. nuclear tests on the Aleutian island of Amchitka with a halibut seiner renamed Greenpeace. Various West Coast Quaker groups gave money, including the Palo Alto Meeting of Friends and the Eugene Meeting of Friends.

Canadians were worried about possible tidal waves and earthquakes from the underground atomic blast and American Quakers had tried to stop nuclear tests twice before by sending the boats Phoenix and Golden Rule into test zones but were quickly arrested and their boats seized. However, if a Canadian boat were to sail into a test zone and stayed outside the actual territorial limit, American authorities could do nothing about it.

The Don’t Make a Wave Committee had talented planners and fundraisers, for all their radicalism—but the radicalism stuck in the public’s mind. As Robert Hunter wrote in his official history of the organization, one of the original patriarchs of Greenpeace was former Philadelphia lawyer Irving Stowe, "a Jew who had joined the Quaker religion" and rabid America-hater.

Stowe’s reasons for leaving America were, of course, Vietnam, refusal to pay taxes that went into the war effort, anger over corruption of the political system, and "creeping fascism." He tended to let all his personal views spill out in his interviews. His public denunciations of American imperialism and atrocities were beginning to embarrass other members of the committee. There were fears that he was stirring up anti-Americanism for its own sake, not because of the specific issue of Amchitka. In fact, Irving Stowe’s attacks on America were to leave such a lasting impression in Vancouver that for years afterward, Greenpeace would be viewed as a tool of Peking or the Kremlin, a reputation that was not helped much a few years later when Stowe traveled to China and came back singing its praises.

When early Greenpeace radical Rod Marining said, "I’m not a Red, I’m a Green," he was not expressing tender love toward free enterprise.

The Quaker principle to "bear witness" was not enough for Greenpeace, which tries to make everybody bear witness—with the Greenpeace point of view, of course. Confrontation, civil disobedience, staged films of animal abuse, inflammatory lies and physical harassment are Greenpeace’s methods despite its avowed adherence to Quaker principles of non-violence. It was for many years entwined with the radical organization, Earth First!, quietly sharing staff, activists and offices.

"The secret to [the late Greenpeace co-founder] David McTaggart’s success is the secret to Greenpeace’s success: It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true. You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth, and a myth-generating machine."

So said Paul Watson, one of the co-founders of Greenpeace. That squib from a long 1991 article in Forbes magazine gives us the aromatic top-note of what Greenpeace is all about—perception is reality and the facts don’t matter.

Grants to Greenpeace Fund

FOUNDATION NAME: Turner Foundation, Inc.
ABSTRACT:  For  World  Heritage Forests program to achieve protection for primary forests in Russia
AMOUNT: $50,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000

FOUNDATION NAME: Turner Foundation, Inc.
ABSTRACT: To map old-growth forest areas in Western Russia, and encourage paper  mills  to  forego  old-growth  wood, and to provide monitoring and testing   information   through  Toxics  Rapid  Response  Laboratory  for communities  in  Volga  River Basin; for national toxics campaign, Global Dioxin  Elimination  Project to develop state, national and international support for elimination of dioxin generating products
AMOUNT: $150,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 1999

FOUNDATION NAME: Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc.
ABSTRACT:  To help build European buyer pressure for sustainable forestry practices in British Columbia
AMOUNT: $100,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000

FOUNDATION NAME: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
ABSTRACT: To increase potential of fundraising from the general public in Russia by   implementing successful Western fundraising techniques appropriate to Russian culture and society
AMOUNT: $100,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000

FOUNDATION NAME: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
ABSTRACT:  To  conserve,  sustainably  manage,  and independently monitor forest resources
AMOUNT: $300,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000
DURATION: 3-year grant

FOUNDATION NAME: The Trust for Mutual Understanding
ABSTRACT:  For  travel  and  related  expenses  for series of seminars on forestry  issues  to  be  held  in  Russia  for  representatives of small regional  NGOs,  and  to  support  Russian  and American participation at conference  on issues of chemical pollution and ecological education held in Volga River Basin
AMOUNT: $40,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000

FOUNDATION NAME: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
ABSTRACT: For Global Pirate Fishing Project
AMOUNT: $450,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000

FOUNDATION NAME: Wallace Global Fund
AMOUNT: $60,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 1999

FOUNDATION NAME: Stephen and Tabitha King Foundation, Inc.
AMOUNT: $10,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 1998

FOUNDATION NAME: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
ABSTRACT: For project, Double Standards in the Oil Production Industry of Russia
AMOUNT: $50,000             YEAR AUTHORIZED: 1999

Back to Exxon Mobil Attack Campaigns Master Page